CROSS-LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVES ON COLOUR TERMINOLOGY

Authors

  • Shukurova Visola BA student at Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Keywords:

cross-linguistic perspectives, colour terminology, human perception, cognition, cultural significance, linguistic diversity, environmental influence, traditional impact, sapir-whorf hypothesis, cognitive processes, colour perception, cultural identity, linguistic categorization, anthropology, psychology, artificial intelligence.

Abstract

This article explores the diversity and universality of colour terminology across different languages and cultures. Drawing from a wide range of cross-linguistic studies, it examines how various communities name and categorize colours, revealing deep insights into human perception, cognition, and cultural significance attached to colours. The study begins by outlining the historical evolution of colour naming, referencing Brent Berlin and Paul Kay's seminal work on basic colour terms, and expands on it by incorporating recent research from linguistics, anthropology, and cognitive science. The core of the analysis focuses on the variability of colour terms, highlighting how some languages have numerous words for colours that might be encompassed by a single term in another language. This linguistic diversity is contextualized within each culture's unique environment, traditions, and needs, showing that colour terminology extends beyond mere perception to encapsulate cultural identity and worldview.

Moreover, the article delves into the cognitive processes underlying colour perception and naming, discussing whether language shapes colour cognition or vice versa. It debates the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in the context of colour, presenting evidence from comparative studies that suggest a bidirectional relationship between linguistic categorization and colour perception. "Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Colour Terminology" underscores the complexity and richness of colour naming across languages. It argues for a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between language, thought, and culture in shaping our perception of the colourful world around us. The findings have implications for the fields of linguistics, anthropology, psychology, and artificial intelligence, offering avenues for further research on the universal and culture-specific aspects of colour and language.

References

Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.

Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and Social Justice. Oxford University Press.

Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-01