SYNTAX IN THE DIGITAL AGE: EXAMINING LANGUAGE EVOLUTION IN ONLINE COMMUNICATION
Ключевые слова:
syntax, digital age, online communication, language evolution, abbreviations, acronyms, emojis, hashtags, punctuation variations, internet linguistics, memes, linguistic analysis, sociocultural lens, communication dynamics.Аннотация
This article explores the evolving landscape of syntax in the Digital Age, focusing on the impact of online communication on language evolution. In a world dominated by digital platforms and messaging apps, the novelty of this research lies in its examination of how communication dynamics have transformed, leading to distinct shifts in syntax. The topicality of the study is underscored by the increasing prevalence of online interactions, making it imperative to understand the nuances and alterations in language use. To unravel these changes, the article employs a multifaceted approach. It delves into the widespread adoption of abbreviations, acronyms, and emoticons, demonstrating their influence on sentence structures. The analysis extends to the role of hashtags and keywords, showcasing how they reshape syntax on social media platforms. Additionally, the study explores variations in punctuation usage and the impact of internet linguistics, with a keen focus on memes as agents of linguistic change. This research combines linguistic analysis with a sociocultural lens to provide a comprehensive understanding of syntax evolution in the digital realm. By identifying these linguistic shifts, the article contributes to our broader comprehension of language adaptation in the Digital Age and offers insights into the dynamic interplay between technology and communication.
Библиографические ссылки
Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312.
Cakir, A. (2016). Effects of Cognitive Load on Novice and Expert Learners’ Processing of Non-Interactive and Interactive Written Arguments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(5), 652–675.
Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge University Press.
Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1), 1–21.
Miller, G. (2016). The Emoji Revolution: Exploring the Complexities of Emojipean Sociolinguistics in Digital Communication. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–12.
Baron, N. S. (2018). How do you feel when you read this? The effect of language used in text-based health and safety messages. Safety Science, 109, 18–28.
Novak, P. K., Smailović, J., Sluban, B., & Mozetič, I. (2015). Sentiment of emojis. PloS One, 10(12), e0144296.
Derks, D., Bos, A. E., & von Grumbkow, J. (2008). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2976–2989.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
Danet, B., Ruedenberg-Wright, L., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (2017). Writing in the center: Facebook groups as community and genre. In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media (pp. 159-179). Oxford University Press.
Jones, R., O’Connor, L., Jackson, W., & Finlayson, M. (2008). Creating and using Twitter as a database to study sustained ambient socio-technical annotation. In Proceedings of the second international conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 88-95).
Crystal, D. (1996). English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, not the same. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 83–100). Cambridge University Press.
